Current issue
Modern Management Systems
Topics of next issues
Current issue
Archive
About the Journal
Editorial office
International editorial board
Reviewers
Open Access policy
Indexation
Publisher
Journal revenues
For authors
Procedure securing the originality of the publication
Principles of developing a scientific publication
Review procedure
Rules for submitting articles
Fees
For reviewers
Ethical standards
ORIGINAL PAPER
PARTNERSHIP ORGANIZATIONAL MECHANISM IN RURAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT: STAKEHOLDERS ANALYSIS
1
ALEKSANDRAS STULGINSKIS UNIVERSITY
Online publication date: 2017-03-31
Publication date: 2017-03-31
NSZ 2017;12(1):71-88
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Process of rural areas development becoming more open and complex. lmpact of stakeholders is getting more elear and transparent for decisions and acts which are done in rural areas. Success and effectiveness of development initiatives ensuring stakeholder's goals that need to be linked with development purposes of rural organizations, which are implemented acting in partnership. Partnership organizational mechanism synchronizes actions and interactions of stakeholders and other elements of the mechanism, organizational changes and also combines interests of stakeholders and motivates them to engage and participate in rural development initiatives in order to solve existing problems. The purpose of this article - to define partnership organizational mechanism and determine stakeholders related with mechanism's functioning. During the investigation the evolution of the mechanism concept was analyzed, that created preconditions for creation of concept of partnership organizational mechanism in rural areas development. The missions analysis of Lithuania's 51 local action groups development strategies (2007-2013 year) allowed to identify stakeholders, that are related to partnership organizational mechanism functioning in rural areas development.
REFERENCES (67)
1.
ALIGICA P. D., 2006, Institutional and stakeholder mapping: frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public organizational review, Vol. 6 (1).
2.
ARIMAVIČIŪTĖ M., 2007, Savivaldos institucijų strateginės analizės metodiniai aspektai. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, Nr. 22, p. 9–17.
3.
BEBBINGTON A., BATTERBURY S.P.J., 2001, Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: political ecologies of globalization. Ecumene 8, 369–80.
4.
BECHTEL W., ABRAHAMSEN A., 2005, Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, Vol. 36.
6.
BOWER G. H., 1975, Cognitive Psychology: An Introduction. In: W. K. Estes (ed.). Handbook of Learning and cognitive process. New York: Wiley.
8.
COLEMAN J. S., 1994, Foundations of social theory, 1st ed. London: Harvard University Press.
10.
CORK DECLARATION: A BETTER LIFE IN RURAL AREAS, 2016, Cork, Ireland, 5-6 September.
11.
DAVIS G. F., MCADAM D., SCOTT W. R., ZALD M. N. (eds.), 2005, Social Movements and Organization Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DALAL-CLAYTON B., BASS S., 2012, Sustainable development strategies – a resource book, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
13.
DARKOH M.B.K., MBAIWA J.E., 2002, Globalization and the livestock industry in Botswana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 23, 149–66.
14.
DARŠKUVIENĖ V., BENDORAITENĖS E., 2013, The Stakeholder Concept Analysis. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, Nr. 68.
15.
ELSTER J., 1989, Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
16.
EPP R., WHITSON D., 2001, Writing off the rural West: globalization, governments and the transformation of rural communities. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
17.
FREEMAN E. R., 2010, Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, 2rd ed. Cambridge University Press.
18.
GLENNAN S., 2005, Modeling mechanisms. Studies in history and philosophy of science part C: studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, Vol. 36.2.
19.
GRAY I., LAWRENCE G., 2001, A future for regional Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HÉDOIN C. (2013). Modeling Social Mechanisms: Mechanism-Based Explanations and Agent-Based Modeling in the Social Sciences. University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France.
22.
HEDSTROM P., SWEDBERG R., 1998, Social Mechanisms. An analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
23.
HERNES G., 1998, Real virtuality. In P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HOOGHE L., MARKS G., 2001, Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
HURWICZ L., 1973, The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 63.
26.
HURWICZ L., STANLEY R., 2007, Designing Economic Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
JUŠČIUS V., 2009, Įmonių socialinė atsakomybė ir organizacijų tapatumas šiuolaikinės ekonominės krizės kontekste. Ekonomika ir vadyba, 2009 (14).
28.
KILLICK T., 2001, Globalization and the rural poor. Development Policy Review 19.
29.
KOOIMAN J., 2000, Societal governance: levels, modes, and orders of social political interaction, in Pierre J. (ed), Debating Governance. Authority, steering and democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
KRONE K. J., JABLIN F. M., PUTNAM L. L., 1987, Communication theory and organizational communication: Multiple perspectives. Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, Vol. 18.1.
31.
LITTLE D., 1991, Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social sciences. CO: Westview Press, Boulder.
32.
LOWE P., N. WARD, 2007, Sustainable rural economies: some lessons from the English experience. p. 15, vol. 5.
33.
LUKESCH R., 2007, The LAG handbook – a guide through the stunning word of local action groups, LEADER+.
34.
LUNENBURG FRED C., 2012, Organizational Structure: Mintzberg’s Framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity. Volume 14, Number 1.
35.
MACHAMER P., DARDEN L., CRAVER C. F., 2000, Thinking about Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67 (1).
36.
MILKOWSKI M., 2011, Beyond Formal Structure: A Mechanistic Perspective on Computation and Implementation. Journal of Cognitive Science, Vol. 12.
38.
OSBORNE S. P., 2006, The New Public Governance? Public Mangement Review, Vol. 8, Issue 3.
39.
OSTROM, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of the social norms. Journal of economic perspectives, Vol. 14 (3).
40.
OSTROM, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
41.
PASQUIER M., VILLENEUVE J., P., 2007, Organizational barriers to transparency: a typology and analysis of organizational behavior tending to prevent or restrict access to information. International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 2007 (73).
42.
PAJUNEN K., 2008, The Nature of Organizational Mechanisms. Organization Studies, Vol. 29 (11).
43.
PÉREZ SÁINZ J.P., ANDRADE-EEKHOFF K.E, 2003, Communities in globalization: the invisible Mayan Nahual. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
44.
POWELL, W., 1991, Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organisation. In Thompson G., Frances J., Levavcic R. and Mitchell J. (eds), Markets and Hierarchies and Networks: The Co-ordination of Social Life, London: Sage.
45.
PIERRE J., 2000, Debating Governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
RAIPA A., 2016, Šiuolaikinio viešojo administravimo pagrindai. Registrų Centras, Vilnius.
48.
REED M., 2000, Organization, trust and control: A realist analysis. Organization Studies, Vol. 22.
49.
REY-VALETTE H., LARDON S., CHIA E., 2008, Special issue on Governance: Institutional and Learning Plans facilitating the Appropriation of Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, n° 2-3-4.
50.
RYBAKOVAS E., 2009, A novel approach of the driving forces of socio-economic regional development. Socialiniai mokslai, Vol. 1 (63).
52.
SCHELLING T., 1998, Social mechanisms and social dynamics. In Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press.
53.
SINDHAV B., ADIDAM P. T., 2005, Marketing Communication as Organizational Communication: Exploration and Synthesis of the Underlying Theoretical Perspectives. Innovative Marketing, Vol. 1 (2).
54.
STINCHCOMBE A. L., 1991, The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 21.
55.
STOLL-KLEEMANN S., WELP M., 2006, Towards a more effective and democratic natural resources management. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management: theory and practice. Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
56.
ŠIMANSKIENĖ L., TARASEVIČIUS T., 2010, Organizacinės kultūros ir vadovų tipų sąsajos. Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development, Vol. 20 (1).
57.
TORRE A., ZUINDEAU B., 2009, Proximity economics and environment: assessment and prospects, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 52, n°1.
58.
WELCH R., 2002, Legitimacy of rural local government in the new governance environment. Journal of rural studies, 18.
59.
WETTENHALL R., 2003, The rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Organization Review, 3, 1.
60.
WOODS M., 2007, Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4).
61.
YESCOMBE C., 2007, Public–Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance, London: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier.
62.
ZAKAREVIČIUS P., 2010, Organizacijos veiklos procesų valdymas. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, Vol. 56.
63.
CAMPBELL, J. L. (2002). Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/O..., (08.04.2016).
64.
FREEMAN, E. R. (2001). Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie, https://businessethics.qwritin... (08.04.2016).
65.
HURWICZ, L. (2009). Asimetrinė informacija ir ekonominės institucijos. Nobelio 2007 m. Ekonomikos mokslų premijos laureatai. Pinigų studijos, Nr. 2, p. 70–94, https://www.lb.lt/nobelio_laur... (08.10.2016).
66.
PARTNERSHIPS: FRAMEWORKS FOR WORKING TOGETHER. STRENGTHENING NONPROFITS: A CAPACITY BUILDER’S RESOURCE LIBRARY (2010), http://www.strengtheningnonpro... (10.10.2016)
67.
PHILLS, J.A., DEIGLMEIER, K. & MILLER, D.T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation.Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall, p. 34-43, http://csi.gsb.stanford.edu/pr... (08.04.2016).
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 2719-860X |
| ISSN: | 1896-9380 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
