PL EN
 
3/2019 vol. 14
Statystyki
CC BY-SA 4.0
Pobierz cytowanie
ARTYKUŁ ORYGINALNY
Analiza cyberfizyczno-społeczno-intencjonalnej Siły Roboczej 4.0
Matthew Gladden 1
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
Anglia Ruskin University Lord Ashcroft International Business School
 
 
Data publikacji online: 25-09-2019
 
 
Data publikacji: 25-09-2019
 
 
NSZ 2019;14(3):15-26
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37055/nsz/132723
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Referencje (51)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
Zarządzanie 4.0
Siła Robocza 4.0
systemy cyberfizyczne
systemy cyberfizyczno-społeczno-intencjonalne
posthumanizacja technologiczna
 
DZIEDZINY
technologie teleinformatyczne w zarządzaniu
 
STRESZCZENIE
Rosnące zastosowanie technologii Przemysłu 4.0, związanych z robotyką społeczną, sztuczną inteligencją, Internetem rzeczy, przetwarzaniem rozpowszechnionym i zaawansowanymi interfejsami człowiek – komputer, wywołuje powstawanie coraz większej liczby „cyberfizycznych” jednostek. Opierając się na ustalonych definicjach takich jednostek, niniejszy tekst proponuje nowe ramy koncepcyjne wyłaniającej się Siły Roboczej 4.0 jako szczególnego rodzaju „systemu cyberfizyczno-społeczno-intencjonalnego”. Zwraca się uwagę na niejednorodność sprawczości, posthumanizację technologiczną, funkcjonalną decentralizację i celowo zaplanowane architektury albo spontanicznie samoorganizujące się topologie manifestowane przez Siłę Roboczą 4.0. Pokazany jest sposób, w jaki taka siła robocza działa w kontekście przestrzeni cyberfizycznej, organizacji cyberfizycznej, ekosystemów cyberfizycznych, społeczeństwa cyberfizycznegoi szerszego cyberfizycznego świata.
 
REFERENCJE (51)
1.
BENEDICT M., SCHLIETER H., 2015, Governance Guidelines for Digital Healthcare Ecosystems, [in:] EHealth2015 – Health Informatics Meets EHealth: Innovative Health Perspectives: Personalized Health, 233-40.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
BRYMAN A., 2016, Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
BURGIO P., ALVAREZ C., AYGUADÉ E., FILGUERAS A., JIMENEZ-GONZALEZ D., MARTORELL X., NAVARRO N., GIORGI R., 2016, Simulating next-generation cyber-physical computing platforms, “Ada User Journal”, nr 37(1), 59-63.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
CRESWELL J.W., CRESWELL J.D., 2018, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
DELEUZE G., GUATTARI F., 1987, A Thousand Plateaus, Massumi, B. (trans.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
DOBBS J., 2015, Toward a Streamlined Software Tool Chain for Cyber-Physical Buildings, doctoral dissertation in Mechanical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
FITZGERALD J., GAMBLE C., PAYNE R., LAM, B., 2017, Exploring the Cyber‐Physical Design Space, “INCOSE International Symposium”, nr 27(1), pp. 371-385.
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
GANTI R.K., TSAI Y.E., ABDELZAHER T.F., 2008, Senseworld: Towards cyber-physical social networks, [in:] Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks, IEEE Computer Society, 563-564.
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
GILL H., 2008, From Vision to Reality: Cyber-Physical Systems, [in:] HCSS National Workshop on New Research Directions for High Confidence Transportation CPS: Automotive, Aviation, and Rail.
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
GLADDEN M.E., 2019, Who Will Be the Members of Society 5.0? Towards an Anthropology of Technologically Posthumanized Future Societies, “Social Sciences”, nr 8, 148.
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
GLADDEN M.E., 2018, Sapient Circuits and Digitalized Flesh: The Organization as Locus of Technological Posthumanization, 2nd ed., Defragmenter Media, Indianapolis.
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
GLADDEN M.E., 2017, Strategic Management Instruments for Cyber-Physical Organizations: Technological Posthumanization as a Driver of Strategic Innovation, “International Journal of Contemporary Management”, nr 16(3), 139-55.
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
GUEDRIA W., LAMINE E., PINGAUD H., 2014, Health Systems Interoperability: Analysis and Comparison, [in:] MOSIM 2014, 10ème Conférence Francophone de Modélisation, Optimisation et Simulation.
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
HUANG H., DAVIS K., 2018, Extracting substation cyber-physical architecture through intelligent electronic devices' data, [in:] 2018 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC), IEEE, 1-6.
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
INGARDEN R., 1987, O odpowiedzialności i jej podstawach ontycznych, [in:] Ingarden, R., Książeczka o człowieku, Węgrzecki, A. (trans.), Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków, 71-169.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
INGARDEN R., 1974, Über die kausale Struktur der realen Welt: Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt III, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen.
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
IVANCEVIC V.G., REID D.J., PILLING M.J., 2017, Mathematics of Autonomy: Mathematical Methods for Cyber-Physical-Cognitive Systems, World Scientific.
Google Scholar
 
 
18.
LINCOLN Y.S., GUBA E.G., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Beverly Hills.
Google Scholar
 
 
19.
LIU Z., YANG D., WEN D., ZHANG W., MAO W., 2011, Cyber-Physical-Social Systems for Command and Control, “IEEE Intelligent Systems”, nr 26(4), 92-96.
Google Scholar
 
 
20.
MARASHI K., SARVESTANI S.S., HURSON A.R., 2018, Consideration of cyber-physical interdependencies in reliability modeling of smart grids, “IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing”, nr 3(2), 73-83.
Google Scholar
 
 
21.
MARRELLA A., MECELLA M., HALAPUU P., SARDINA S., 2015, Automated Process Adaptation in Cyber-Physical Domains with the SmartPM System (Short Paper), [in:] 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), IEEE, 59-64.
Google Scholar
 
 
22.
MINCHEV Z., DUKOV G., 2016, Emerging Hybrid Threats Modelling & Exploration in the New Mixed Cyber-Physical Reality, [in:] Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Business Information Security (BISEC 2016), 13-17.
Google Scholar
 
 
23.
MOLDOVAN D., COPIL G., DUSTDAR S., 2018, Elastic systems: Towards cyber-physical ecosystems of people, processes, and things, “Computer Standards & Interfaces”, 57, 76-82.
Google Scholar
 
 
24.
MONOSTORI L., 2014, Cyber-Physical Production Systems: Roots, Expectations and R&D Challenges, “Procedia CIRP”, 17, 9-13.
Google Scholar
 
 
25.
MORDECAI Y., CHAPMAN C., DORI D., 2013, Conceptual Modelling of Physical-Informatical Essence Duality of Cyber-Physical Entities, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, October 13-16, Manchester.
Google Scholar
 
 
26.
MORRIS T.H., SRIVASTAVA A.K., REAVES B., PAVURAPU K., ABDELWAHED S., VAUGHN R., MCGREW W., DANDASS Y., 2009, Engineering future cyber-physical energy systems: Challenges, research needs, and roadmap, [in:] 2009 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), IEEE, 1-6.
Google Scholar
 
 
27.
NING H., LIU H., 2015, Cyber-physical-social-thinking space based science and technology framework for the Internet of Things, “Science China Information Sciences”, nr 58(3), 1-19.
Google Scholar
 
 
28.
PARK Y.L., YOUNG D., CHEN B.R., WOOD R.J., NAGPAL R., GOLDFIELD, E.C., 2013, Networked bio-inspired modules for sensorimotor control of wearable cyber-physical devices, [in:] 2013 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), IEEE, 92-96.
Google Scholar
 
 
29.
PATEL C., LEI Y., LIU L., VERNICA R., FAN J., SHORT B., LIU J., SIMSKE, S.J., 2017, Learning in the 21st century cyber-physical age, “APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing”, 6.
Google Scholar
 
 
30.
PETROLO R., LOSCRI V., MITTON N., 2016, Cyber-Physical Objects as key elements for a Smart Cyber-City, [in:] Management of Cyber Physical Objects in the Future Internet of Things, Springer, Cham, 31-49.
Google Scholar
 
 
31.
RASMUSSEN T.B., YANG G., NIELSEN A.H., DONG Z., 2018, Effects of centralized and local PV plant control for voltage regulation in LV feeder based on cyber-physical simulations, “Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy”, nr 6(5), 979-991.
Google Scholar
 
 
32.
REN Y., TOMKO M., SALIM F.D., CHAN J., SANDERSON M., 2018, Understanding the predictability of user demographics from cyber-physical-social behaviours in indoor retail spaces, “EPJ Data Science”, nr 7(1).
Google Scholar
 
 
33.
SALDIVAR A.A.F., LI Y., CHEN W.N., ZHAN Z.H., ZHANG J., CHEN L.Y., 2015, Industry 4.0 with cyber-physical integration: A design and manufacture perspective, [in:] 2015 21st international conference on Automation and computing, IEEE, 1-6.
Google Scholar
 
 
34.
SEIGER R., KELLER C., NIEBLING F., SCHLEGEL T., 2015, Modelling complex and flexible processes for smart cyber-physical environments, “Journal of Computational Science”, 10, 137-148.
Google Scholar
 
 
35.
SHOU L., WU S., 2013, Supporting Efficient Social Media Search in Cyber-Physical Web, “IEEE Data Eng. Bull.”, nr 36(3), 83-90.
Google Scholar
 
 
36.
SMIRNOV A., SANDKUHL K., SHILOV N., 2013, Multilevel self-organisation of cyber-physical networks: synergic approach, “International Journal of Integrated Supply Management”, nr 8(1-3), 90-106.
Google Scholar
 
 
37.
SOKOLOWSKI R., 2000, Introduction to Phenomenology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
 
 
38.
TEILHARD DE CHARDIN, S.J., P., 1966, The Vision of the Past, Cohen, J.M. (trans.), Harper and Row, New York.
Google Scholar
 
 
39.
THOMPSON B., HARANG, R., 2017, Identifying Key Cyber-Physical Terrain, [in:] Proceedings of the 3rd ACM on International Workshop on Security And Privacy Analytics, ACM, 23-28.
Google Scholar
 
 
40.
TSIGKANOS C., KEHRER T., GHEZZI C., 2016, Architecting dynamic cyber-physical spaces, “Computing”, nr 98(10), 1011-1040.
Google Scholar
 
 
41.
VROOM R.W., HORVÁTH I., 2014, Cyber-physical augmentation: An exploration, [in:] Tools and methods of competitive engineering. Digital Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering TMCE.
Google Scholar
 
 
42.
WAN J., CHEN M., LEUNG V.C., 2014, M2M Communications in the Cyber-Physical World, “Machine-to-Machine Communications: Architectures, Technology, Standards, and Applications” 1.
Google Scholar
 
 
43.
WANG F.Y., ZHANG J.J., WANG X., 2018, Parallel intelligence: toward lifelong and eternal developmental AI and learning in cyber-physical-social spaces, “Frontiers of Computer Science”, 1-5.
Google Scholar
 
 
44.
WANG H., ZHENG Z., 2014, Collective self-adaptive software architecture specification: understanding uncertainty in cyber-physical convergence, “Journal of Computers”, nr 9(4).
Google Scholar
 
 
45.
WANG H., LI Q., YI F., LI Z., SUN L., 2016, Influential spatial facility prediction over large scale cyber-physical vehicles in smart city, “EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking”, 1, 103.
Google Scholar
 
 
46.
WANG Y., VURAN M.C., GODDARD S., 2008, Cyber-Physical Systems in Industrial Process Control, “ACM Sigbed Review”, nr 5(1).
Google Scholar
 
 
47.
WEAVER G.A., CHEH C., ROGERS E.J., SANDERS W.H., GAMMEL D., 2013, Toward a cyber-physical topology language: Applications to NERC CIP audit, [in:] Proceedings of the first ACM workshop on Smart energy grid security, ACM, 93-104.
Google Scholar
 
 
48.
XIAO-LE W., HONG-BIN H., SU D., LI-NA C., 2012, A service-oriented architecture framework for cyber-physical systems, [in:] Recent Advances in Computer Science and Information Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 671-676.
Google Scholar
 
 
49.
YARDLEY T., Berthier R., NICOL D., SANDERS W.H., 2013, Smart grid protocol testing through cyber-physical testbeds, [in:] 2013 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), IEEE, 1-6.
Google Scholar
 
 
50.
YU Z., OUYANG J., LI S., PENG X., 2017, Formal modeling and control of cyber-physical manufacturing systems, “Advances in Mechanical Engineering”, nr 9(10), 1687814017725472.
Google Scholar
 
 
51.
ZHUGE H., 2010, Cyber Physical Society, [in:] Proceedings of the 2010 Sixth International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge and Grids, IEEE Computer Society, 1-8.
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
Indeksy
 
Indeks słów kluczowych
Indeks dziedzin
Indeks autorów
eISSN:2719-860X
ISSN:1896-9380
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top