ORIGINAL PAPER
Traditional and electronic channels of communication on OSH management in workers’ opinions
 
More details
Hide details
1
Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy Zakład Zarządzania Bezpieczeństwem i Higieną Pracy
 
 
Online publication date: 2022-03-28
 
 
Publication date: 2022-03-28
 
 
NSZ 2022;17(1):13-24
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the results of a survey conducted to determine workers’ preferences for OSH communication channels and to assess the usefulness of information provided through classical and electronic communication channels for improving occupational safety and health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey was conducted with the use of questionnaire in 2016 and in 2021. The findings for before and during the pandemic period are comparable: the majority of workers choose classic communication channels such as traditional training and meetings with management and traditional conversations with colleagues. OSH information considered useful for safe work performance is mainly communicated through classical channels. Social media were rated lowest in terms of usefulness. The survey results indicate that electronic channels can support, but not replace, the classic channels used in OSH communication.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
AVEN, T., SKLET, S., VINNEM, J.E., 2006. Barrier and operational risk analysis of hydrocarbon releases (BORA-Release) Part I. Method description, Journal of Hazardous Materials, nr A137.
 
2.
CRAWFORD, J., DAVIS, A., COWIE, H., RITCHIE, P., RASHID, S., DIXON, K., WALKER, G., 2016a. OSH knowledge and its management, IOSH 2016, https://www.iosh.com/media/342... (13.12.2021).
 
3.
CRAWFORD, J.O., DAVIS, A., WALKER, G., COWIE, H., RITCHIE, P., 2016b. Evaluation of knowledge transfer for occupational safety and health in an organizational context: development of an evaluation framework, Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, nr 14(1).
 
4.
DAVOUDIAN, K., WU, J. APOSTOLAKIS, G., 1994. Incorporating organizational factors into risk assessment through the analysis of work process, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, nr 45(1).
 
5.
GAO, Y., GONZALEZ, V.A., YIU, T.W., 2019. The effectiveness of traditional tools and computer-aided technologies for health and safety training in the construction sector: A systematic review, Computers & Education, nr 138.
 
6.
HOLTZHAUSEN, D., 2002. The effects of a divisionalised and decentralised organisational structure on a formal internal communication function in a South African organisation, Journal of Communication Management, nr 6(4).
 
7.
JAARVINEN, J., TOOLLINEN, A., KARJALUOTO, H., JAYAWARDHENA, C., 2012. Digital and social media marketing usage in B2B industrial section, Marketing Management Journal, nr 22(2).
 
8.
LEE, CH.E., 2010. Face-to-face Versus Computer-mediated Communication: Exploring Employees’ Preference of Effective Employee Communication Channel, International Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts, nr 1(2).
 
9.
LEE, S., HWANG, T., LEE, H.H., 2005. Corporate blogging strategies of the Fortune 500 companies, Management Decision, nr 44(3).
 
10.
LEE, T., 1998. Assessment of safety culture at a nuclear reprocessing plant, Work & Stress, An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, nr 12(3).
 
11.
LIPIAAINEN, H.S.M., KARJALUOTO, H.E., NEVALAINEN, M., 2014. Digital channels in the internal communication of a multinational corporation, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, nr 19(3).
 
12.
PAWŁOWSKA, Z., 2016. Methods used for communicating OSH-related issues in companies, Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie, nr 32(4).
 
13.
PAWŁOWSKA, Z., SKŁAD, A., ORDYSIŃSKI, SZ., 2016. Przygotowanie wytycznych i materiałów informacyjnych na temat skutecznego komunikowania się w zarządzaniu BHP. Seminarium dla przedstawicieli przedsiębiorstw. Publikacja. Etap 3: Ocena skuteczności tradycyjnych i innowacyjnych metod komunikowania się na tematy BHP, Raport niepublikowany z projektu IV.P.01.
 
14.
PĘCIŁŁO, M., 2018. The role of organizational factors in OSH management performance, Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie, nr 4(40).
 
15.
PN-ISO 45001:2018-6, 2018. Systemy zarządzania bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy. Wymagania i wytyczne stosowania, Warszawa: Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny.
 
16.
PODGÓRSKI, D., 2010. The Use of Tacit Knowledge in Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics (JOSE), nr 16(3).
 
17.
RAETH, P, SMOLNIK, S, URBACH, N., ZIMMER, C., 2009. Towards assessing the success of social software in corporate environments, AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2... (13.12.2021).
 
18.
REHMAN, S. MAROUF, L., 2008. Communication Channels and Employee Characteristics: An Investigation, Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, nr 37.
 
19.
RUCK, K., WELCH, M., 2012. Valuing internal communication; management and employee perspectives, Public Relations Review, nr 38.
 
20.
SHEREIHIY, B., KARWOWSKI, W., 2006. Knowledge management for occupational safety, health, and ergonomics, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, nr 16(3).
 
21.
SKŁAD, A., 2015. Przegląd czynników organizacyjnych istotnych w zarządzaniu bezpieczeństwem i higieną pracy, Bezpieczeństwo Pracy – Nauka i Praktyka, nr 5.
 
22.
VEGIAYAN, K.D., BAGHESTAN, A.G., ASFARANJAN, Y.S., 2013. Exploring Employees Preference of Communication Channel, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, nr 18(4).
 
eISSN:2719-860X
ISSN:1896-9380
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top