ORIGINAL PAPER
Smart city development, sustainability, and territorial communities: The case of Lutsk
Olena Kuzmak 3, A-F
,
 
Roman Dorczak 4, A-F
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
WSB University, Poland
 
2
University of the National Education Commission, Poland
 
3
Lutsk National Technical University, Ukraine
 
4
Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2026-04-27
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-05-07
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-05-13
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-07-31
 
 
Publication date: 2026-07-31
 
 
NSZ 2026;21(3):69-90
 
HIGHLIGHTS
  • The research was carried out during the implementation of the „Nagrody im. I. Wyhows-
  • kiego” scholarship program.
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Research objectives and hypothesis/research questions:
The aim of the article is to demonstrate the importance of the smart city concept in the process of sustainable development of territorial communities, using the case of Lutsk. The study also seeks to identify the main components of smart city development and to assess the possibilities of their application in urban development, with particular emphasis on the challenges and prospects characteristic of contemporary Ukrainian cities.

Research methods:
The article applies a review of the relevant literature, an analysis of documents, reports, and secondary data related to the development of Lutsk, as well as a survey conducted in the city. The adopted research approach made it possible to combine a theoretical perspective with empirical analysis, which allowed for a multidimensional view of the studied problem.

Main results:
The conducted analysis made it possible to determine the degree of implementation of smart city principles in Lutsk and to indicate the most important achievements and limitations related to this process. The results show that smart city development can constitute an important tool supporting the sustainable development of territorial communities.

Implications for theory and practice:
The conclusions also have practical significance, as they may provide a basis for formulating recommendations for urban policies and for activities undertaken in the process of reconstruction and modernization of Ukrainian cities.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
“LIVE” SENSORS, 2019. «Живі» датчики, якіпрацюютьбезлюдськоговтручання, розмістилинаоб’єктах КП «Луцькводоканал» [“Live” sensors that work without human intervention were placed at the facilities of KP “Lutskvodokanal”], Official website of the Lutsk City Council, https://www.lutskrada.gov.ua/p... (accessed: 8.03.2026).
 
2.
AHVENNIEMI, H., HUOVILA, A., PINTO-SEPPÄ, I., AIRAKSINEN, M., 2017. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?, Cities, No. 60 (A), pp. 234-245.
 
3.
ALBINO, V., BERARDI, U., DANGELICO, R.M., 2015. Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives, Journal of Urban Technology, No. 22 (1), pp. 3-21.
 
4.
ANGELIDOU, M., 2015. Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces, Cities, No. 47, pp. 95-106.
 
5.
ANGELIDOU, M., 2017. The role of smart city characteristics in the plans of fifteen cities, Journal of Urban Technology, No. 24 (4), pp. 3-28.
 
6.
ANTHOPOULOS, L., 2017. Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases, Cities, No. 63, pp. 128-148.
 
7.
BATTY, M., AXHAUSEN, K.W., GIANNOTTI, F., POZDNOUKHOV, A., BAZZANI, A., WACHOWICZ, A., OUZOUNIS, G., PORTUGALI, Y., 2012. Smart cities of the future, The European Physical Journal Special Topics, No. 214 (1), pp. 481-518.
 
8.
CALZADA, I., COBO, C., 2015. Unplugging: Deconstructing the smart city, Journal of Urban Technology, No. 22 (1), pp. 23-43.
 
9.
CAMPBELL, T., 2012. Beyond Smart Cities: How Cities Network, Learn, and Innovate, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
 
10.
CARAGLIU, A., DEL BO, C., NIJKAMP, P., 2011. Smart cities in Europe, Journal of Urban Technology, No. 18 (2), pp. 65-82.
 
11.
DEL SAZ SALAZAR, S., GARCÍA MENÉNDEZ, L., 2007. Estimating the non market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter?, Land Use Policy, 24 (1), pp. 296-305.
 
12.
DOHERTY, M., KLIMA, K., HELLMANN, J.J., WILLIAMS, D.S., 2020. Climate change adaptation in smart cities: A systematic review, Sustainable Cities and Society, No. 61.
 
13.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2020. European Innovation Partnership on Smart Cities and Communities (EIP-SCC), https://smart-cities-marketpla... (accessed: 20.03.2026).
 
14.
GAZZOLA, P., DYMCHENKO, O., SRIBNYI, V., PANOVA, O., 2019. Towards Sustainable Urban Development: the Ukrainian Situation, Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal, No. 2 (2), pp. 92-100.
 
15.
GIFFINGER, R., FERTNER, C., KRAMAR, H., KALASEK, R., MILANOVIĆ, N., MEIJERS, E., 2007. Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities, Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology.
 
16.
GIL-GARCÍA, J.R., PARDO, T.A., NAM, T., 2015. What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization, Information Polity, No. 20 (1), pp. 61-87.
 
17.
HOLLANDS, R.G., 2008. Will the real smart city please stand up?, City, No. 12 (3), pp. 303-320.
 
18.
JAEGER, P.T., BOWMAN, C.A., 2005. Understanding disability: Inclusion, access, diversity, and civil rights, Santa Barbara: Greenwood Publishing Group.
 
19.
KABISCH, N., QURESHI, S., HAASE, D., 2016. Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces – A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, No. 50, pp. 25-34.
 
20.
KATAKIS, I., 2015. Mining urban data, Information Systems, No. 54, pp. 113-114.
 
21.
KITCHIN, R., 2014. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism, Geo Journal, No. 79 (1), pp. 1-14.
 
22.
KOIRALA, B.P., VAN OOST, E., VAN DER WINDT, H., 2016. Community energy storage: A responsible innovation towards a sustainable energy system?, Applied Energy, No. 231, pp. 570-585.
 
23.
KOMNINOS, N., 2014. The Age of Intelligent Cities: Smart Environments and Innovation-for-all Strategies, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
 
24.
KONIJNENDIJK, C.C., ANNERSTEDT, M., NIELSEN, A.B., MARUTHAVEERAN, S., 2013. Benefits of urban parks: A systematic review, International Federation of Parks and Recreation Administration.
 
25.
KUZMAK, O.I., KUZMAK, O.M., 2023. Transformational processes of ensuring sustainable urban development: The realities of Ukraine, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, No. 1254 (1).
 
26.
LAZAROIU, G.C., ROSCIA, M., 2012. Definition methodology for the smart cities model, Energy, No. 47 (1), pp. 326-332.
 
27.
LOMBARDI, P., GIORDANO, S., FAROUH, H., YOUSEF, W., 2012. Modelling the smart city performance, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, No. 25 (2), pp. 137-149.
 
28.
LUCIC, M.C., WAN, X., GHAZZAI, H., MASSOUD, Y., 2020. Leveraging Intelligent Transportation Systems and Smart Vehicles Using Crowdsourcing: An Overview, Smart Cities, No. 3 (2), pp. 341-361.
 
29.
LUTSK CITY COUNCIL, 2024. Development Strategy of the Lutsk City Territorial Community until 2030, https://www.lutskrada.gov.ua/s... (accessed: 8.03.2026).
 
30.
MARENICHENKO, V.V., SHPORTYUK, N.L., DOBRYANSKY, A.V., 2022. World experience of social partnership mechanisms implementation and its application in Ukraine, Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Public Administration, No. 33 (72), pp. 58-63.
 
31.
MEIJER, A., BOLÍVAR, M.P.R., 2016. Governing the smart city: A review of the literature on smart urban governance, International Review of Administrative Sciences, No. 82 (2), pp. 392-408.
 
32.
MORA, L., BOLICI, R., DEAKIN, M., 2017. The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis, Journal of Urban Technology, No. 24 (1), pp. 3-27.
 
33.
NAM, T., PARDO, T.A., 2011. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions, [in:] Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 282-291.
 
34.
NEIROTTI, P., DE MARCO, A., CAGLIANO, A.C., MANGANO, G., SCORRANO, F., 2014. Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylized facts, Cities, No. 38, pp. 25-36.
 
35.
PAPA, E., LAUWERS, D., 2015. Smart Mobility: Opportunity or Threat to Innovate Places and Cities?, [in:] 20th International Conference on Urban Planning and Regional Development in the Information Society, pp. 543-550.
 
36.
PASKALEVA, K., EVANS, J., WATSON, K., 2021. Co-producing smart cities: A Quadruple Helix approach to assessment, European Urban and Regional Studies, No. 28 (4), pp. 395-412.
 
37.
RAZA, W., BOJKE, L., COVENTRY, P.A., MURPHY, P.J., FULBRIGHT, H., WHITE, P.C.L., 2024. A systematic review of the impact of changes to urban green spaces on health and education outcomes, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, No. 21 (11).
 
38.
RODRIGUES, V., DA ROSA RIGHI, R., DA COSTA, C.A., ZEISER, F.A., ESKOFIER, B., MAIER, A., KIM, D., 2023. Digital health in smart cities: Rethinking the remote health monitoring architecture on combining edge, fog, and cloud, Health and Technology, No. 13, pp. 449-472.
 
39.
SCHLICHER, B.G., MACINTYRE, L.P., ABERCROMBIE, R.K., 2016. Towards reducing the data exfiltration surface for the insider threat, [in:] Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2749-2758.
 
40.
UNDP, 2022. Identification of correlations between subnational expenditures and oblast’s dynamics in achieving SDGs, https://www.undp.org/ukraine/p... (accessed: 8.03.2026).
 
41.
UNITED NATIONS, 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed: 20.03.2026).
 
42.
VYGOVSKA, O.V., DEKHTYARENKO, Y.F., 2021. Ecological aspects of development of modern Ukrainian cities, Public Administration: Improvement and Development, No. 10.
 
43.
WOLFRAM, M., 2012. Deconstructing smart cities: An intertextual reading of concepts and practices for integrated urban and ICT development, [in:] M. Schrenk, V.V. Popovich, P. Zeile, P. Elisei (eds.), Proceedings of REAL CORP 2012 – Re-Mixing the City: Towards Sustainability and Resilience?, Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning (CORP), pp. 171-181.
 
44.
WORLD BANK, 2022. Ukraine Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment, https://openknowledge.worldban... (accessed: 8.03.2026).
 
45.
WORLD BANK, 2023. Second Ukraine Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA2): February 2022–February 2023, https://documents.worldbank.or... (accessed: 8.03.2026).
 
46.
WÓJCIK-CHODOROWSKA, J., 2025a. Appreciative inquiry and the engagement of local government employees: A case study, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series, No. 236, pp. 533-557.
 
47.
WÓJCIK-CHODOROWSKA, J., 2025b. Znaczenie i rola dyskursu doceniającego w zarządzaniu pozytywną zmianą organizacyjną. Analiza na przykładzie formacji militarnej, Przegląd Policyjny, No. 158 (2), pp. 129-151.
 
48.
YIGITCANLAR, T., HAN, H., KAMRUZZAMAN, M., 2019. Approaches, advances, and applications in the sustainable development of smart cities: A commentary from the guest editors, Energies, No. 12 (23).
 
eISSN:2719-860X
ISSN:1896-9380
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top