REVIEW PAPER
Problems of digitalization in institutions of higher education
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Regional Research named after M.I. Dolishniy of the NAS of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine
Online publication date: 2023-09-26
Publication date: 2023-09-26
NSZ 2023;18(3):85-98
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Today, digitalization of higher education has become a vital necessity for quality education of
students. With the help of digitization, it is possible to significantly expand the competencies of students
and teachers. This process is influenced by certain circumstances, the most important of which are technical
and technological capabilities and a complex of problems that arise in the event of an imperfect or even
non-existent digitalization strategy of the organization. A strategy that can be implemented involves the
development of a clear plan of action, it is broken down into stages, its goal is achievable, and intermediate
goals are simple and clear; problems should, if possible, be foreseen and methods of their leveling should
be calculated in advance. The article considers three alternative directions of digitalization of higher education,
tentatively named: “Intensive technological adaptation”, “Balanced digitalization” and “Innovative
digital transformation”. Each of these directions requires specific aspects of implementation. The objects
of influence of digitalization in the institution of higher education are: educational and administrative
procedures; scientific research; international cooperation and student life. Ivan Franko Lviv National University
has developed a long-term digitalization strategy, however, after an acute force majeure situation
(the COVID-19 pandemic) arose, there was a need to accelerate the introduction of digitalization, online
learning platforms, distance and blended learning; it was implemented in the shortest possible time. After
the emergence of an acute armed conflict on the territory of Ukraine, the need for further digitization
only intensified, today it concerns not only the educational process, but also the possibility of preserving
traditional values and cultural heritage, expanding research opportunities and international cooperation.
The use of interactive and practical elements of education (discussions, seminars, laboratory classes and
workshops) remains very important, you should not completely abandon live communication.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Adeyemon, E., 2009. Integrating digital literacies into outreach services for underserved youth populations, Reference Librarian, Vol. 50(1), pp. 85-98.
2.
Baird, C., Henninger, M., 2011. Serious play, serious problems: Issues with eBook applications, Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, No. 3(2), pp. 1-17.
3.
Boterf Le, G., 2000. Compétence et navigation professionnelle, Paris: Editions d’Organisation.
4.
Cattaneo, A.A.P., Antonietti, C., Rauseo, M., 2022. How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors, Computers & Education, Vol. 176.
6.
Delfino, M., 2011. Against BibliOblivion: How modernize scribes digitized an old book, Computers & Education, Vol. 57, pp. 2145-2155.
7.
Eurydice, 2012. Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011. European Commission. Retrived May 29, 2012,
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/educ... (access: 20.09.2023).
8.
Hina, S., Selvam, D.D.D.P., Lowry, P.B., 2019. Institutional governance and protection motivation: Theoretical insights into shaping employees’ security compliance behavior in higher education institutions in the developing world, Computers & Security, Vol. 87.
9.
Hite, R.L., Jones, M.G., Childers, G.M., 2024. Classifying and modeling secondary students’ active learning in a virtual learning environment through generated questions, Computers & Education, Vol. 208.
10.
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., Kantosalo, A., 2016. Digital competence – an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 21(3), pp. 655-679.
11.
Jones-Kavalier, B., Flannigan, S.L., 2008. Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st century, Teacher Librarian, Vol. 35(3), pp. 13-16.
12.
Kaplenko, H., Kulish, I., Hrabovetska, O., Stasyshyn, A., Dubyk, V., 2023. Functioning of a higher educational institution under force majeure circumstances: A case study of Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 21, No. 2.
13.
Korthagen, F., 2004. In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education, Teaching and Teacher Education, No. 20, pp. 77-97.
14.
Krumsvik, R., 2008. Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence, Education & Information Technologies, Vol. 13(4), pp. 279-290.
15.
Márquez-Ramos, L., 2021. Does digitalization in higher education help to bridge the gap between academia and industry? An application to COVID-19, Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 35(6), pp. 630-637.
16.
Matt, C., Hess, T., Benlian, A., 2015. Digital transformation strategies, Business and Information Systems Engineering, Vol. 7(5), pp. 339-343.
17.
Mayer, S., Schwemmle, M., 2023. Teaching university students through technologymediated experiential learning: Educators’ perspectives and roles, Computers & Education, Vol. 207.
18.
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Order “On approval of the Regulation on distance learning” dated April 25, 2013, No. 466,
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws... (in Ukrainian) (access: 7.09.2023).
19.
O’Brien, D., Scharber, C., 2008. Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Vol. 52(1), pp. 66-68.
20.
Rahardja, U., 2022. Blockchain Education: as a Challenge in the Academic Digitalization of Higher Education, IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), No. 4(1), pp. 62-69.
21.
Rosak-Szyrocka, J., Żywiołek, J., Zaborski, A., Chowdhury, S., Hu Y.-C., 2022. Digitalization of Higher Education Around the Globe During COVID-19, IEEE Access, Vol. 10, pp. 59782-59791.
22.
Ryabova, Z., 2020. Profesiyne zrostannya pedahohiv v umovakh tsyfrovoyi osvity [Professional growth of teachers in the conditions of digital education]. Informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi i zasoby navchannya [Information technologies and teaching aids], No. 6, pp. 369-385.
23.
Shaughnessy, H., 2018. Creating digital transformation: Strategies and steps, Strategy and Leadership, Vol. 46(2), pp. 19-25.
24.
Sultana, M., 2013. Impact of Training in Pharmaceutical Industry: An Assessment on Square Pharmaceuticals Limited, Bangladesh, International Journal of Science and Research, Vol. 2(2), pp. 576-587.
25.
Sohail, Kh., Nabaz, N.A., 2019. The impact of staff training and development on teachers’ productivity, Economics, Management and Sustainability, Vol. 4 (1), pp. 37-45.
26.
Telukdarie, A., Munsamy M., 2019. Digitization of Higher Education Institutions, [in:] 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Macao, China, 2019, pp. 716-721.
27.
Thecla, A.Y.E., 2016. Teachers’ perception of the impact of training and retraining on teachers’ productivity in Enugu State, Nigeria, Journal of Research in Business and Management, Vol. 4(3), pp. 33-37.
28.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2005. The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. The DeSeCo Project,
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4... (access: 5.09.2023).