ORIGINAL PAPER
Modelling container dwell time, throughput, and rehandle productivity at Lekki Freeport Terminal
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Lekki Freeport Terminal, Nigeria
 
2
Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
 
 
Submission date: 2025-08-21
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-09-11
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-02-28
 
 
Publication date: 2026-02-28
 
 
NSZ 2026;21(1):11-40
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Research objectives and hypothesis/research questions:
It aims at identifying the influence of container dwell time to define the yard operational performance based on the comparison of throughput and rehandling performance operating with various storage strategies.

Research methods:
Since the global trade has become sensitive, terminal operations in the effective movement of the containers have become a critical aspect in reducing congestion. To facilitate the analysis, this paper introduces simple methods to evaluate the effect of container dwell time and storage policies on import throughput, storage density, and rehandling productivity. To estimate the expected number of rehandles when delivering an import container to a road truck, a Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) method is utilized. The MCS method is an approach for iteratively evaluating a deterministic model using sets of random numbers as inputs. There are three important reasons for employing the MCS method. First, it allows us to make conclusions about the variance of the expected rehandles as a function of stack height and storage strategies. Second, it allows us to conveniently solve for ad hoc rehandling strategies – unique rehandling strategies employed by Lekki Freeport Terminal(LFT), when the bay is full. Third, it circumvents the need to make restrictive assumptions regarding the probability of containers of being delivered to external trucks. In essence, MCS provides a robust way of estimating the number of rehandles.

Main results:
The results demonstrate that extended dwell times lead to operational bottlenecks, resulting in reduced yard efficiency and increased rehandling requirements. This is particularly evident when analyzing rehandling under equal and non-equal probability models, where higher dwell variability amplifies inefficiencies. By improving dwell time management, terminals can achieve better throughput performance and streamline rehandling processes. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that probabilistic modeling provides valuable insights into rehandling outcomes, enabling terminals to predict and mitigate potential productivity losses. Addressing dwell time challenges is critical for enhancing container yard operations and accommodating increasing trade volumes efficiently.

Implications for theory and practice:
The findings provide a quantitative model of improving the performance at LFT and at other similar terminals.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to use this opportunity to acknowledge the following people for their support, suggestion and feedback during the period of this research: Prince Usang, Innocent Peter Mbaba, Henry Chukwuma, Innocent Okewu, Stephen Ezuome Nkem, Hillary Chika Mbaogu, Bobby Ogan, Kingsley Kalu Chukwuemeka Obinna Opurum and Augustine Omenoye Nkem.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
ADUNBI, O., STEIN, H., 2019. The Political Economy of China’s Investment in Nigeria: Prometheus or Leviathan?, [in:] Oqubay, A., Lin, J.Y. (eds.), China-Africa and an Economic Transformation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 192-215.
 
2.
CHEN, H., WANG, H., 2021. Container throughput forecasting of Tianjin-Hebei port group based on grey combination model, Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 2021, pp. 1-9.
 
3.
COŞAR, A.K., DEMIR, B., 2018. Shipping inside the box: Containerization and trade, Journal of International Economics, No. 114, pp. 331-345.
 
4.
DING, X., WANG, M., 2022. Container freight rates and international trade causality nexus: Evidence from panel VAR approach for Shanghai and ASEAN-6 countries, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Vol. 2022, pp. 1-10.
 
5.
ESKAFI, M., KOWSARI, M., DASTGHEIB, A., ULFARSSON, G.F., STEFANSSON, G., TANEJA, P., THORARINSDOTTIR, R.I., 2021a. A model for port throughput forecasting using Bayesian estimation, Maritime Economics & Logistics, No. 23, pp. 348-368.
 
6.
ESKAFI, M., KOWSARI, M., DASTGHEIB, A., ULFARSSON, G.F., TANEJA, P., THORARINSDOTTIR, R.I., 2021b. Mutual information analysis of the factors influencing port throughput, Maritime Business Review, No. 6 (2), pp. 129-146.
 
7.
ESKAFI, M., ULFARSSON, G.F., 2022. Flexible and adaptive port planning, https://www.vegagerdin.is/vefu... (accessed: 12.08.2025).
 
8.
GERRITS, B., MES, M., SCHUUR, P., 2020. Mixing it Up: Simulation of Mixed Traffic Container Terminals, 2020 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), Orlando, FL, USA, 2020, pp. 1384-1395.
 
9.
HLALI, A., HAMMAMI, S., 2019. The evolution of containerization and its impact on the Maghreb ports, Annals of Marine Science, No. 3 (1), pp. 001-005.
 
10.
 
11.
HUYNH, N., 2008. Analysis of container dwell time on marine terminal throughput and rehandling productivity, Journal of International Logistics and Trade, No. 6 (2), pp. 69-89.
 
12.
JEEVAN, J., OTHMAN, M.R., SAHARUDDIN, A.H., PARK, G.K., DO, T.M.H., 2018. An evolution of a nexus between Malaysian seaport centric logistic and industrial revolution 4.0: Current status and future strategies, International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, No. 10, pp. 1-15.
 
13.
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, 1986. Improving productivity in US marine container terminals, Washington: The National Academies Pres.
 
14.
NOTTEBOOM, T., YANG, D., XU, H., 2020. Container barge network development in inland rivers: A comparison between the Yangtze River and the Rhine River, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, No. 132, pp. 587-605.
 
15.
SMITH, D., 2021. Big data insights into container vessel dwell times, Transportation Research Record, No. 2675 (10), pp. 1222-1235.
 
16.
SPEER, U., FISCHER, K., 2017. Scheduling of different automated yard crane systems at container terminals, Transportation Science, No. 51 (1), pp. 305-324.
 
17.
WATADA, J., ROY, A., KADIKAR, R., PHAM, H., XU, B., 2019. Emerging trends, techniques and open issues of containerization: A review, IEEE Access, No. 7, pp. 152443-152472.
 
eISSN:2719-860X
ISSN:1896-9380
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top